temperature timeline

Read more »

one option

Scott Santens:

What underlies a question like this is that it’s okay to force people to work by withholding what they need to live, in order to force them to work for us. And at the same time, because they are forced, we don’t even pay them enough to meet their basic needs that we are withholding to force them to work.

What is a good word to describe this?

…

My favorite story is Garrison Frazier. It’s a story I first learned about from Karl Widerquist, and included in this article. He was a freed slave and chosen as the spokesperson for other freed slaves. He was asked about slavery and how he could be truly free from ever being enslaved again.

Slavery is, receiving by irresistible power the work of another man, and not by his consent. The freedom, as I understand it, promised by the proclamation, is taking us from under the yoke of bondage, and placing us where we could reap the fruit of our own labor, take care of ourselves and assist the Government in maintaining our freedom… The way we can best take care of ourselves is to have land, and turn it and till it by our own labor…”

This is to say that without owning a minimum amount of land, it is not possible to truly live by your own labor. One must have this ability in order to not be forced to work for others. If you can’t grow your own food or build your own house, you can’t live by your own hands. This option must exist. But does it make any sense in this day and age to give everyone land? How would we even accomplish this? How would it be universal and equal in quantity and quality? What if some land didn’t grow food? How would this work in cities where our markets have created the dense populations of labor required for them to exist?

Universal basic income is how …

[link to full article]

* * *

People have long been coerced to work by denying them access to resources that let them survive otherwise. The shorthand for this is “enclosure of the commons,” that is, fencing people off from what they can use to sustain themselves. The image of the engraving in the tweet embedded below is of forcible enclosure and expulsion, from Commoning, a Resilience post by Brian Davey.

# # #

“the pain you feel is capitalism dying”

Samuel Alexander wrote:

* * *

# # #

Abenomics enters new phase

In early August, Abenomics entered a new phase as the government detailed a fiscal stimulus package of 28 trillion yen (US$265.3 billion), roughly six per cent of Japan’s economy.

Compare with $100 billion as reported in the July 31 post on this topic, infrastructure: finance as everyone’s business


two-thirds of all Canadians back a guaranteed income of $30,000

Pierre Trudeau and Richard Nixon flirted with guaranteed minimum
income plans. Canadians of 2016 skeptical about cost

As many as 67 per cent of respondents backed a guaranteed income set at $30,000, provided that the payment would “replace most or all other forms of government assistance.”

However, nearly as many (66 per cent) said they would not be willing to pay more taxes to support such a program, and 59 per cent said it would be too expensive to implement. 

A further 63 per cent said it would “discourage people from working.” Among Conservative voters, this sentiment jumped to 74 per cent of respondents. But even in the NDP camp respondents were split 50-50.

Finland will soon be debuting a plan to pay every citizen $1,100 per month, and scrap all other benefit programs.

# # #



want nothing, be well

image credited in a related post: want nothing

may all want nothing but that all want nothing

wanting anything – wanting something to be or not to be – is dukkha;
nirvana is needing nothing and wanting nothing, not even this:
that all want nothing

* * *

want nothing, be well

want nothing … other than that all want nothing;
be well: do no more than need be done to be and let be*

* * *

*with loving-kindness, compassion, empathic joy, and equanimity

a UBI proposal from 1918 (Bertrand Russell)

responding to a phenomenon


“Donald Trump is responding to a global phenomenon … He is not the phenomenon.” —Chris Hedges


the phenomenon is the rage of the dispossessed

infrastructure: finance as everyone’s business


public finance, like the law, is a social construct; it’s what we all agree it to be

opinion alert: personal value statement follows

foundations of money and credit: not products to let banks profit, but infrastructure to let people prosper

* * *

Japan may show the rest of us how to spend on worthwhile infrastructure projects by printing money, that is, by moving the interest on new national debt down to zero percent and keeping it there; the next step is to move away from fractional reserve banking by moving the reserve requirement up to one hundred percent and keeping it there.